Paramedic Clinical Consults with a Paramedic or Nurse in an EMS Communications Center Compared to Traditional Online Physician Consults
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: In many emergency medical services (EMS) systems, a direct medical oversight physician is available to paramedics for mandatory and/or elective consultations. At the time of this study, a clinical support desk (CSD) was being implemented within the medical communications center of a provincial EMS system in addition to the physician resource. The CSD was initially staffed with a registered nurse or an advanced care paramedic. The objective of the current study was to compare CSD "peer to peer" consults versus physician consults with regards to consultation patterns, transport dispositions, and patient safety measures. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 2 months before (September 1 to October 31, 2012) and 2 months after (September 1 to October 31, 2013) implementation of the CSD. In the before period, all clinical consults were fielded by the direct medical oversight physician. In the after period, consults were fielded by the physician, CSD or both. EMS databases were queried, and manual chart review and abstraction of audio recordings were done. Relapses back to EMS within 48 hours of non-transport were measured. RESULTS: 1621 consults were included, with 764 consults in the before period and 857 after (p = 0.02). The number of physician consults decreased from 764 before to 464 after (39.2%, p < 0.001), with the CSD taking 325 (37.9%) consults. The CSD was consulted more for police custody and trip destination. The physician was consulted more for cease resuscitation and clinical consults prior to medication administration. Overall non-transport rates were 595/764 before (77.9%), and 646/857 after (75.4%) (p = 0.2). Non-transports were 233/325 (71.7%) via the CSD, 364/464 (78.4%) via the physician, and 49/68 (72.1%) when both were involved (p = 0.07). Rate of relapse to EMS was similar before (25/524, 4.8%) and after (26/568, 4.6%) (p = 0.76), and between CSD (12/216, 5.5%) and physician consults (13/325, 4.0%) in the after period (p = 0.41). CONCLUSION: The introduction of a novel "peer-to-peer" consult program was associated with an increased total number of consults made and reduced call volume for direct medical oversight physicians. There was no change in the patient safety measure studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".