MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310276883 · doi:10.1002/advs.202203918

In Vivo Anchoring Bis‐Pyrene Probe for Molecular Imaging of Early Gastric Cancer by Endoscopic Techniques

2022· article· en· W4310276883 on OpenAlexaff
Qiang Luo, Chaoqiang Fan, Wang Ying, Yiyang Hu, Zhaohui Luan, Shaosong Ye, Chunli Gong, Yu Huang, Yufeng Xiao, Yang Chen, Malcolm Xing, Lei Wang, Shiming Yang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicNanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
FundersArmy Medical UniversityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsMolecular imagingNanoprobeAngiogenesisMolecular probeCancerPathologyCancer researchMedicineIn vivoChemistryBiologyNanotechnologyMaterials scienceInternal medicineBiochemistryNanoparticle

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract With the development of blue laser endoscopy (BLE) technique, it's often used to diagnose early gastric cancer (EGC) by the morphological changes of blood vessels through BLE. However, EGC is still not obvious to identify, resulting in a high rate of missed diagnosis. Molecular imaging can show the changes in early tumors at molecular level, which provides a possibility for diagnosing EGC. Therefore, developing a probe that visually monitors blood vessels of EGC under BLE is particularly necessary. Herein, a bis‐pyrene (BP) based nanoprobe (BP‐FFVLK‐(PEG)‐RGD, M 1 ) is designed, which can target angiogenesis and self‐assemble into fibers in situ, resulting in stable and long‐term retention in tumor. Moreover, M 1 probe can emit yellow‐green fluorescence for imaging under BLE. M 1 probe is confirmed to steadily remain in tumor for up to 96 hours in mice transplanted subcutaneously. In addition, the M 1 probe is able to target angiogenesis for molecular imaging of isolated human gastric cancer tissue under BLE. Finally, M 1 probe i.v. injected into primary gastric cancer model rabbits successfully highlighted the tumor site under BLE, which is confirmed by pathological analysis. It's the first time to develop a probe for diagnosing EGC by visualizing angiogenesis under BLE, showing great clinical significance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.581

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced ScienceSame topicNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsFrench-language works237,207