Reconstruction of polysyndactyly of the fused fifth toe with the fourth toe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Polysyndactyly of the fused fifth toe with the fourth toe is a common subtype of postaxial polydactyly. The aim of the study was to present an operative technique for cosmetic improvement and reconstruction of polysyndactyly of the fused fifth toe with the fourth toe. We retrospectively reviewed the details of 22 patients with postaxial polydactyly treated from January 2018 to May 2021. The operation involved medial toe excision and web space reconstruction using a dorsal rectangular flap without skin grafting and simultaneous correction of a valgus deformity by chondroplasty and soft tissue balancing without an osteotomy. The web shape, scar, and aesthetic outcomes were evaluated on the criteria of the D'Arcangelo, Vancouver Scar Scale score, and satisfactory questionnaire, respectively. The patients were followed up for 7-43 months. At the last follow-up, valgus deformity was completely corrected without recurrence. On the basis of the criterion of D'Arcangelo, the height and width of the webs were good in 24 of the feet, fair in four of the feet, and poor in none of the feet. The mean Vancouver Scar Scale score was 1.55. All parents and patients were satisfied with the appearance and function. The described medial toe excision technique and reconstruction of the web space without a skin graft corrected the valgus deformity and were able to satisfy functional and cosmetic requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".