Transtentorial herniation syndrome from meningococcal meningitis in a young woman: the case for neurocritical care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report a case of a previously healthy early adolescent female who presented with meningococcal meningitis. While in hospital, she had marked neurologic deterioration with clinical herniation from malignant cerebral oedema. She was transferred to a neurocritical care centre where she underwent invasive intracranial pressure (ICP) and brain tissue oxygen (P bt O 2 ) monitoring. Early in her course, she demonstrated a compete absence of autoregulation, with pressure passive cerebral blood flow. As a result, maintaining a mean arterial pressure between 50 mm Hg and 60 mm Hg, which ensured adequate cerebral oxygenation, while avoiding increases in ICP. Although her course was initially complicated by bilateral optic neuropathy, she has subsequently made a full neurologic recovery and is now undertaking postsecondary education. This case highlights that access to specialist neurocritical care, guided by neurophysiologic monitoring of ICP and P bt O 2 , may help improve outcomes, even among those patients with catastrophic cerebral oedema from bacterial meningitis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".