Differences in resting state functional connectivity underlie visuomotor performance declines in older adults with a genetic risk (APOE ε4) for Alzheimer’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Non-standard visuomotor integration requires the interaction of large networks in the brain. Previous findings have shown that non-standard visuomotor performance is impaired in individuals with specific dementia risk factors (family history of dementia and presence of the APOE ε4 allele) in advance of any cognitive impairments. These findings suggest that visuomotor impairments are associated with early dementia-related brain changes. The current study examined the underlying resting state functional connectivity (RSFC) associated with impaired non-standard visuomotor performance, as well as the impacts of dementia family history, sex, and APOE status. Methods Cognitively healthy older adults (n = 48) were tested on four visuomotor tasks where reach and gaze were increasingly spatially dissociated. Participants who had a family history of dementia or the APOE ε4 allele were considered to be at an increased risk for AD. To quantify RSFC within networks of interest, an EPI sequence sensitive to BOLD contrast was collected. The networks of interest were the default mode network (DMN), somatomotor network (SMN), dorsal attention network (DAN), ventral attention network (VAN), and frontoparietal control network (FPN). Results Individuals with the ε4 allele showed abnormalities in RSFC between posterior DMN nodes that predicted poorer non-standard visuomotor performance. Specifically, multiple linear regression analyses revealed lower RSFC between the precuneus/posterior cingulate cortex and the left inferior parietal lobule as well as the left parahippocampal cortex. Presence of the APOE ε4 allele also modified the relationship between mean DAN RSFC and visuomotor control, where lower mean RSFC in the DAN predicted worse non-standard visuomotor performance only in APOE ε4 carriers. There were otherwise no effects of family history, APOE ε4 status, or sex on the relationship between RSFC and visuomotor performance for any of the other resting networks. Conclusion The preliminary findings provide insight into the impact of APOE ε4-related genetic risk on neural networks underlying complex visuomotor transformations, and demonstrate that the non-standard visuomotor task paradigm discussed in this study may be used as a non-invasive, easily accessible assessment tool for dementia risk.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".