MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310490696 · doi:10.1049/pbhe044e_ch13

Security and Privacy in smart Internet of Things environments for well-being in the healthcare industry

2022· book-chapter· en· W4310490696 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitution of Engineering and Technology eBooks · 2022
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicIoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInternet of ThingsContext (archaeology)Computer scienceHealth careComputer securityBody area networkWirelessHealthcare industryAnalyticsThe InternetBig dataData scienceInternet privacyTelecommunicationsWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Privacy protection is required when communicating data in the healthcare system. The Internet of Things (IoT) in healthcare has numerous advantages, including the potential to more closely monitor patients' health and the use of data for analytics. IoT is a framework of interconnected, web-connected devices that may collect and transmit data via a wireless server without the need for human involvement. In this context, IoT-based healthcare uses many technological advances to give several services such as quick and efficient treatment, savings, and better communication. Wireless Body Area Network (WBAN) technology can improve the performance of data communication in smart systems. Throughout each stage of smart medical systems, machine learning (ML) can be applied. In this study, the most current research, suggested approaches, and existing smart healthcare system technologies are discussed in terms of technological advances, applications, and difficulties to provide a proper overview of what IoT signifies in the healthcare sector now and in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.709
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it