Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The rise of the Hungarian Soviet Republic shocked the peacemakers at the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, as it signaled the spread of Bolshevism from Soviet Russia to the West. They feared that the dreaded ideology could inspire a revolution in Germany. For this reason, some of the peace conferees favored military intervention and the overthrow of the Hungarian government. President Wilson, the most influential leader in Paris, was against intervention and called for caution. He was concerned that the US forces would get into a never-ending quagmire in Hungary. Drawing lessons from the Thermidorian turn of revolutions, he counted on the eventual collapse of the radical Bolshevik experiment in Hungary. For this reason, he also objected to the aggressive acts of the so-called small allies, Romania and Czecho-Slovakia, on Hungarian soil. He blamed them for the rise and survival of the Soviet regime, as their aggression generated nationalist resistance in Hungary. Wilson’s eventual solution to the Hungarian problem was the speedy completion of the peace treaty. For its sake he abandoned his much-touted principle of self-determination and was willing to disregard any part of his Fourteen Points.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".