A Brief History of the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) was initially established in 1972 as the Lawson Wilkins Pediatric Endocrine Society (LWPES), by some of Wilkins' former fellows. As the society grew from its 37 founding members and Dr. Wilkins' influence faded, the name of the society was changed in 2010 and now counts about 1,500 members, mostly from the US and Canada. Pediatric endocrine training programs headed by (LW)PES members have welcomed fellows from throughout the world, many of whom have gone on to leadership positions in their home countries. Starting in 1981, the (LW)PES has collaborated with pediatric endocrine societies around the world in quadrennial meetings, fostering collaborations, transfer of ideas, devising joint practice guidelines, and enjoying one another's fellowship and counsel. The PES presently has committees and special interest groups concerned with all aspects of pediatric endocrinology, assuring that our clinical and academic resources reflect both breadth and depth. To celebrate our 50th anniversary, selected members have written the historical manuscripts featured in this special issue of Hormone Research in Pediatrics. These historical reviews delve into the origins of our specialty, sometimes deep into antiquity, provide useful background information, and illustrate the kinds of intellectual struggles that have led to the development of contemporary pediatric endocrinology, worldwide.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.013 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".