MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310572152 · doi:10.1128/spectrum.02270-22

Validating Methods To Eradicate Plant-Pathogenic Ralstonia Strains Reveals that Growth <i>In Planta</i> Increases Bacterial Stress Tolerance

2022· article· en· W4310572152 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Madeline M. Hayes, Ronnie J. Dewberry, Lavanya Babujee, Rebecca Moritz, Caitilyn Allen

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrobiology Spectrum · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyRalstonia solanacearumRalstoniaMicrobiologyEnvironmental stressPlant growthBacteriaGeneticsBotanyPathogenEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bacteria in the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex (RSSC) are globally distributed and cause destructive vascular wilt diseases of many high-value crops. These aggressive pathogens spread in diseased plant material and via contaminated soil, tools, and irrigation water. A subgroup of the RSSC, race 3 biovar 2, is a European and Canadian quarantine pathogen and a U.S. select agent subject to stringent and constantly evolving regulations intended to prevent pathogen introduction or release. We validated eradication and inactivation methods that can be used by (i) growers seeking to disinfest water and manage bacterial wilt disease outbreaks, (ii) researchers who must remain in compliance with regulations, and (iii) regulators who are expected to define containment practices. Relevant to all these stakeholders, we show that while cultured RSSC cells are sensitive to relatively low levels of oxidative chemicals, desiccation, and heat, more aggressive treatment, such as autoclaving or incineration, is required to eradicate plant-pathogenic Ralstonia growing inside plant material.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrobiology SpectrumSame topicPlant Pathogenic Bacteria StudiesFrench-language works237,207