MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310643040 · doi:10.7326/m22-3317

Ongoing Need for Clinical Trials and Contemporary End Points for Outpatient COVID-19

2022· letter· en· W4310643040 on OpenAlexaff
Todd C. Lee, David R. Boulware

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of Internal Medicine · 2022
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCOVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineClinical trialCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Family medicineClinical PracticeMEDLINEAlternative medicineRandomized controlled trialOutpatient clinicGerontologyInfectious disease (medical specialty)SurgeryPathologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The American College of Physicians presents recommendations for the outpatient treatment of COVID-19 based on Sommer and colleagues' systematic review. The editorialists commend the authors of the recommendations and review for trying to summarize the rapidly evolving literature into clear practice points and discuss the challenges of continually updating reviews and associated recommendations as new evidence emerges and relevant outcomes evolve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.137
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.503
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.137
Threshold uncertainty score0.724

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.1370.503
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0060.005
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.008
Scholarly communication0.0120.018
Open science0.0070.005
Research integrity0.0390.048
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.598
GPT teacher head0.612
Teacher spread0.014 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of Internal MedicineSame topicCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207