Precoded Large Scale Multi‐User‐MIMO System Using Likelihood Ascent Search for Signal Detection
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Multiple antennas at each user equipment (UE) and/or thousands of antennas at the base station (BS) comprise the extremely spectrum efficient large scale multi‐user multiple input multiple output system (BS). Due to space constraints, the closely spaced numerous antennas at each UE may cause inter antenna interference (IAI). Furthermore, when one UE comes into contact with another UE in the same cellular network, multi‐user interference (MUI) may be introduced to the received signal. To mitigate IAI, efficient precoding pre‐coding is necessary at each UE, and the MUI present at the BS can be canceled by efficient Multi‐user Detection (MUD) techniques. The majority of earlier literature deal with one or more of these interferences. This paper implements a joint pre‐coding and MUD, Lenstra‐Lovasz (LLL) based Lattice Reduction (LR) assisted likelihood accent search (LAS) (LLL‐LR‐LAS), to mitigate IAI and MUI simultaneously LLL‐based LR pre‐coding mitigates IAI at each UE, and the LAS algorithm is a neighborhood search‐based MUD that cancels BS MUI. The proposed approaches' performance was evaluated using Bit Error Rate analysis, and their complexity were determined using multiplication and addition.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".