MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310938553 · doi:10.1111/rda.14298

Luteal function in cyclic goats treated with human chorionic gonadotropin administered by intramuscular or intravaginal routes at the time of artificial insemination

2022· article· en· W4310938553 on OpenAlexaff
Juliana Nascimento Duarte Rodrigues, José Domingos Guimarães, Paulo Sérgio Cerqueira Rangel, Maria Emília Franco Oliveira, Felipe Zandonadi Brandão, Pawel M. Bartlewski, J. F. da Fonseca

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction in Domestic Animals · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas GeraisConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoEmpresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
KeywordsHuman chorionic gonadotropinArtificial inseminationEstrous cycleEquine chorionic gonadotropinLuteal phaseInseminationIntramuscular injectionAndrologyGonadotropinMedicineEndocrinologyInternal medicineAnimal scienceBiologyOvulationHormonePregnancySperm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) has been used to improve goats reproductive efficiency. This study aimed to (i) evaluate if hCG administered by the intramuscular (i.m.) or intravaginal (i.vag.) route can be detected by a rapid β‐hCG test in blood plasma samples and (ii) document ovarian effects of hCG administered by both routes at the time of artificial insemination (AI) performed 60 h after oestrus synchronization in goats. Twenty‐two Alpine goats received two i.m. injections of 30 μg of d‐cloprostenol (Prolise®, Tecnopec, São Paulo, Brazil) 7.5 days apart. One day after the onset of oestrus (at the time of AI), the goats were randomly allocated to one of the three groups that received: control ( n = 7): 0.3 ml of saline solution intravaginally; hCG i.m. ( n = 7): 300 IU of hCG (Vetecor®; Hertape‐Calier, São Paulo, Brazil) i.m. and hCG i.vag. ( n = 8): 300 IU of hCG deposited intravaginally. Blood samples were drawn at −1, 3, 6, 9 and 24 h after as well as on days 3, 7, 10, 13, 17 and 21 after hCG treatment/AI. All animals tested negative for hCG (ECO Diagnóstica, Corinto, Brazil) at −1 h, and all control animals tested negative throughout the entire blood collection period. All hCG i.m. animals tested positive from 3 h until D3 post‐AI but only 50% of hCG i.vag. goats tested positive during the present study. In all animals studied, mean circulating P 4 concentrations increased ( p < .05) from D3 to D7 after AI and then declined ( p < .05) from D10 to D17 in control and hCG i.m. groups and from D17 to D21 in the hCG i.vag. group. Total cross‐sectional luteal area (CLA), mean colour Doppler area (DA), DA/CLA, mean high‐velocity Doppler area and HVDA/CLA all declined ( p < .05) by D17–D21 in all animals studied. In summary: (i) human chorionic gonadotropin could consistently be detected in blood samples using the rapid β‐hCG test only in the hCG i.m. group; and (ii) there were no significant differences in the mean pregnancy rate, circulating P 4 concentrations and various luteal parameters studied among Control, hCG i.m. and hCG i.vag. dose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.971
Threshold uncertainty score0.794

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction in Domestic AnimalsSame topicReproductive Physiology in LivestockFrench-language works237,207