Culturally adapted psychological intervention for treating maternal depression in British mothers of African and Caribbean origin: A randomized controlled feasibility trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Women are likely to suffer from maternal depression due to childbirth difficulties and parenting responsibilities, leading to long-term negative consequences on their children and families. British mothers of African/Caribbean origin uptake of mental healthcare is low due to the lack of access to culturally appropriate care. METHODS: A mixed-methods randomized controlled feasibility trial was adopted to test the appropriateness and acceptability of Learning Through Play plus Culturally adapted Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (LTP+CaCBT) for treating maternal depression compared with Psychoeducation (PE). Mothers (N = 26) aged 20-55 were screened for depression using the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Those who scored >5 on PHQ-9 were further interviewed using the Revised Clinical Interview Schedule to confirm the diagnosis and randomized into LTP+CaCBT (n = 13) or PE (n = 13) groups. Assessments were taken at baseline, end of the intervention at 3- and 6-months post-randomization. N = 2 focus groups (LTP+CaCBT, n = 12; PE, n = 7) and N = 8 individual interviews were conducted (LTP+CaCBT, n = 4; PE, n = 4). RESULTS: The LTP+CaCBT group showed higher acceptability, feasibility and satisfaction levels than the PE group. Participants experienced the intervention as beneficial to their parenting skills with reduced depression and anxiety in the LTP+CaCBT compared to the PE group. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first feasibility trial of an integrated online parenting intervention for British African and Caribbean mothers. The results indicated that culturally adapted LTP+CaCBT is acceptable and feasible. There is a need to study the clinical and cost-effectiveness of LTP+CaCBT in an appropriately powered randomized control trial and include the child's outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www. CLINICALTRIALS: gov (no. NCT04820920).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".