Core of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> studied by the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>) proton-removal reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The $^{9}\mathrm{Be}(^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}(5/{2}^{+}),^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$)X proton-removal reaction was studied at the NSCL using the S800 spectrometer. The experimental spectroscopic factor for the ground-state to ground-state transition indicates a substantial depletion of the proton ${d}_{5/2}$ strength compared to shell-model expectations, similar to the findings of an inverse-kinematics $(p,2p)$ measurement performed at RIBF. The $^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}$ to $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$ ground-states overlap is considerably less than anticipated if the core nucleons behaved as rigid, doubly-magic $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$ within $^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}$. We interpret the new results within the framework of the Particle-Vibration Coupling (PVC) model, of a ${d}_{5/2}$ proton coupled to a quadrupole phonon of an effective core. This approach provides a good description of the experimental data, requiring an effective $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}^{*}$ core with a phonon energy of $\ensuremath{\hbar}{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{2}$= 3.2 MeV and a $B(E2)\ensuremath{\approx}2.7$ W.u. -- softer and more collective than a bare $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$. Both the Nilsson deformed mean field and the PVC models appear to capture the properties of the effective core of $^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}$, suggesting that the additional proton polarizes $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$ in such a way that it becomes either slightly deformed or a quadrupole vibrator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.061 | 0.008 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".