MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311006199 · doi:10.1103/physrevc.106.l061303

Core of <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts></mml:math> studied by the <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mrow><mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mi mathvariant="normal">F</mml:mi><mml:mprescripts/><mml:none/><mml:mn>25</mml:mn></mml:mmultiscripts><mml:mo>(</mml:mo><mml:mo>−</mml:mo><mml:mi>p</mml:mi></mml:mrow></mml:math>) proton-removal reaction

2022· article· lv· W4311006199 on OpenAlexaff
H. L. Crawford, M. D. Jones, A. O. Macchiavelli, P. Fallon, D. Bazin, P. C. Bender, B. A. Brown, C. M. Campbell, R. M. Clark, M. Cromaz, B. Elman, A. Gade, J. D. Holt, R. V. F. Janssens, I. Y. Lee, B. Longfellow, S. Paschalis, M. Petri, A. Richard, M. Salathe, J. A. Tostevin, D. Weißhaar

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. C · 2022
Typearticle
Languagelv
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsTRIUMF
FundersOak Ridge National LaboratoryNuclear PhysicsLawrence Berkeley National LaboratoryRoyal SocietyU.S. Department of EnergyScience and Technology Facilities CouncilOffice of ScienceNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPhysicsQuadrupoleProtonGround stateEnergy (signal processing)InverseAtomic physicsNuclear magnetic resonanceNuclear physicsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The $^{9}\mathrm{Be}(^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}(5/{2}^{+}),^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$)X proton-removal reaction was studied at the NSCL using the S800 spectrometer. The experimental spectroscopic factor for the ground-state to ground-state transition indicates a substantial depletion of the proton ${d}_{5/2}$ strength compared to shell-model expectations, similar to the findings of an inverse-kinematics $(p,2p)$ measurement performed at RIBF. The $^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}$ to $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$ ground-states overlap is considerably less than anticipated if the core nucleons behaved as rigid, doubly-magic $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$ within $^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}$. We interpret the new results within the framework of the Particle-Vibration Coupling (PVC) model, of a ${d}_{5/2}$ proton coupled to a quadrupole phonon of an effective core. This approach provides a good description of the experimental data, requiring an effective $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}^{*}$ core with a phonon energy of $\ensuremath{\hbar}{\ensuremath{\omega}}_{2}$= 3.2 MeV and a $B(E2)\ensuremath{\approx}2.7$ W.u. -- softer and more collective than a bare $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$. Both the Nilsson deformed mean field and the PVC models appear to capture the properties of the effective core of $^{25}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{F}$, suggesting that the additional proton polarizes $^{24}\phantom{{}^{B}e}\mathrm{O}$ in such a way that it becomes either slightly deformed or a quadrupole vibrator.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.5080.504

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. CSame topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207