Measuring global activity performance in children with cerebral palsy in West Africa: validation of an adapted version of the ACTIVLIM-CP questionnaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose To calibrate a West-African version of the ACTIVLIM-CP questionnaire (ACTIVLIM-CP-WA) for children with cerebral palsy (CP).Materials and Methods We recruited 287 children with CP of various age range: 2–6 years (n = 117, preschoolers), 6–12 years (n = 96, children) and 12–19 years (n = 74, adolescents). Caregivers of children of each age range completed the experimental version of the ACTIVLIM-CP-WA including 76 (preschoolers), 78 (children) and 76 (adolescents) global daily life activities. Responses were analyzed using the Rasch RUMM2030 software.Results The final West-African version of ACTIVLIM-CP including 31 items (both common and age-specific items) defined a unidimensional, linear scale with well-discriminated response categories. It presented a high internal consistency (R = 0.94). Moreover, all items were locally independent and the item difficulty hierarchy was invariant regarding caregivers’ education, children’s age and gender, MACS and GMFCS levels. The ACTIVLIM-CP-WA measures were significantly correlated (p < 0.05) with Gross Motor Function Classification System (ρ = −0.77), Manual Ability Classification System (ρ = −0.75), Box and Block test (dominant hand r = 0.51; non-dominant hand r = 0.49), One-minute walking test (r = 0.28), and Timed up and Go test (r = −0.40).Conclusions The ACTIVLIM-CP-WA questionnaire provides a valid and reliable tool that has the potential to follow children’s evolution and quantify changes consecutive to neurorehabilitation in Sub-Saharan Africa.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe West-African version of the ACTIVLIM-CP questionnaire (ACTIVLIM-CP-WA) measures global activities requiring a combination of lower and upper extremities in children with cerebral palsy.As a Rasch-built scale, measures are unidimensional and linear to document changes in children with cerebral palsy from 2 to 19 years in Sub-Saharan Africa.Rehabilitation professionals are encouraged to use the ACTIVLIM-CP-WA questionnaire as a psychometrically robust assessment tool measuring the global performance in daily life activities in children with cerebral palsy in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".