MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4311025052 · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34732-5

Genome-wide association study of REM sleep behavior disorder identifies polygenic risk and brain expression effects

2022· article· en· W4311025052 on OpenAlexafffund
Lynne Krohn, Karl Heilbron, Cornelis Blauwendraat, Regina H. Reynolds, Eric Yu, Konstantin Senkevich, Uladzislau Rudakou, Mehrdad A. Estiar, Emil K. Gustavsson, Kajsa Brolin, Jennifer A. Ruskey, Kathryn Freeman, Farnaz Asayesh, Ruth Chia, Isabelle Arnulf, Jacques Montplaisir, Jean‐François Gagnon, Alex Désautels, Yves Dauvilliers, Gian Luigi Gigli, Mariarosaria Valente, Francesco Janes, Andrea Bernardini, Birgit Högl, Ambra Stefani, Abubaker Ibrahim, Karel Šonka, David Kemlink, Wolfgang H. Oertel, Annette Janzen, Giuseppe Plazzi, Francesco Biscarini, Elena Antelmi, Michela Figorilli, Monica Puligheddu, Brit Mollenhauer, Claudia Trenkwalder, Friederike Sixel‐Döring, Valérie Cochen De Cock, Christelle Monaca, Anna Heidbreder, Luigi Ferini‐Strambi, Femke Dijkstra, Mineke Viaene, Beatriz Abril, Bradley F. Boeve, Stella Aslibekyan, Adam Auton, Elizabeth Babalola, Robert K. Bell, Jessica Bielenberg, Katarzyna Bryc, Emily Bullis, Daniella Coker, Gabriel Cuéllar-Partida, Devika Dhamija, Sayantan Das, Sarah L. Elson, Teresa Filshtein, Kipper Fletez‐Brant, Pierre Fontanillas, Will Freyman, Pooja Gandhi, Barry Hicks, David A. Hinds, Ethan M. Jewett, Yunxuan Jiang, Katelyn Kukar, Keng‐Han Lin, Maya Lowe, Jey C. McCreight, Matthew H. McIntyre, Steven J. Micheletti, Meghan E. Moreno, Joanna L. Mountain, Priyanka Nandakumar, Elizabeth S. Noblin, Jared O’Connell, Aaron A. Petrakovitz, G. David Poznik, Morgan Schumacher, Anjali J. Shastri, Janie F. Shelton, Jingchunzi Shi, Suyash Shringarpure, Vinh Tran, Joyce Y. Tung, Xin Wang, Wei Wang, Catherine H. Weldon, Peter Wilton, Alejandro Hernandez, Corinna Wong, Christophe Toukam Tchakouté, Sonja W. Scholz, Mina Ryten, Sara Bandrés‐Ciga, Alastair J. Noyce, Paul Cannon, Lasse Pihlstrøm, Mike A. Nalls, Andrew Singleton, Guy A. Rouleau, Ronald B. Postuma, Ziv Gan‐Or

Bibliographic record

VenueNature Communications · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à MontréalUniversité de MontréalMcGill Genome CentreHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMcGill UniversityCanadian Sleep & Circadian NetworkMontreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
FundersNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeMedical Research CouncilFonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et CultureU.S. Department of Health and Human ServicesNational Institutes of HealthCanada First Research Excellence FundParkinson CanadaParkinson's UKBarts CharityNational Institute on AgingConsortium canadien en neurodégénérescence associée au vieillissementWellcome TrustMcGill UniversityMichael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's ResearchFoundation for the National Institutes of Health
KeywordsGenome-wide association studyBiologyNeuroscienceGenetic architecturePolygenic risk scoreSynucleinopathiesGenetic associationSleep (system call)GeneticsBioinformaticsMedicineGeneSingle-nucleotide polymorphismAlpha-synucleinPhenotypeGenotypeDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rapid-eye movement (REM) sleep behavior disorder (RBD), enactment of dreams during REM sleep, is an early clinical symptom of alpha-synucleinopathies and defines a more severe subtype. The genetic background of RBD and its underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Here, we perform a genome-wide association study of RBD, identifying five RBD risk loci near SNCA, GBA, TMEM175, INPP5F, and SCARB2. Expression analyses highlight SNCA-AS1 and potentially SCARB2 differential expression in different brain regions in RBD, with SNCA-AS1 further supported by colocalization analyses. Polygenic risk score, pathway analysis, and genetic correlations provide further insights into RBD genetics, highlighting RBD as a unique alpha-synucleinopathy subpopulation that will allow future early intervention.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.292
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNature Communications→Same topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments→French-language works237,207→