MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311047449 · doi:10.1002/prep.202200239

An Autonomously Self‐Healing Silicone Polyurea Waterproof Coating for Combustible Cartridge Cases

2022· article· en· W4311047449 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Zhang, Zhenggang Xiao

Bibliographic record

VenuePropellants Explosives Pyrotechnics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer composites and self-healing
Canadian institutionsMinistry of Education and Child Care
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsCoatingPolyureaMaterials scienceSelf-healingElastomerComposite materialSiliconeCartridge

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Nitrocellulose‐based combustible cartridge case (NC‐3C) is highly hygroscopic, which greatly limits its broader application. The effective strategy for NC‐3Cs to prevent moisture is the endowment of waterproof coatings. However, the traditional waterproof coatings for NC‐3Cs cannot self‐heal the inevitable mechanical microcracks suffered during handling and storage, which often gives moisture much more opportunities to destroy the internals. Therefore, it is necessary to develop a self‐healing waterproof coating for the protection of NC‐3Cs. Herein, a smart self‐healing silicone polyurea (SPU) elastomer based on dynamic reversible hydrogen bonds is designed as a waterproof coating for NC‐3Cs. The SPU elastomer shows an outstanding self‐healing efficiency of 99.06 % after 12‐hour self‐healing at room temperature. And it also can self‐heal its damages even when the ambient temperatures rise to 50 °C or drop to −18 °C. Moreover, the SPU‐coated NC‐3C can also self‐heal its microcracks in time after being scratched and obtains extremely low water absorptions (<0.20 %) after 24‐hour soaking, exhibiting good waterproof performance. Endowing the waterproof coating with self‐healing ability is a promising design strategy to repair the coating microcracks and improve the environmental adaptability of NC‐3C during handling and storage. This work pioneers a new design of self‐healing waterproof coating for NC‐3Cs, and it has a positive guiding significance to expend broader application of NC‐3C.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePropellants Explosives PyrotechnicsSame topicPolymer composites and self-healingFrench-language works237,207