Identification of Sex-Specific Genetic Variants Associated With Tau PET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Objectives Important sex differences exist in tau pathology along the Alzheimer disease (AD) continuum, with women showing enhanced tau deposition compared with men, especially during the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) phase. This study aims to identify specific genetic variants associated with sex differences in regional tau aggregation, as measured with PET. Methods Four hundred ninety-three participants (women, n = 246; men, n = 247) who self-identified as White from the AD Neuroimaging Initiative study, with genotyping data and 18F-Flortaucipir tau PET data, were included irrespective of clinical diagnosis (cognitively normal [CN], MCI, and AD). We focused on the genetic variants within 10 genes previously shown to have sex-dependent effects on AD to reduce the burden of multiple comparisons: BIN1, MS4A6A, DNAJA2, FERMT2, APOC1, APOC1P1, FAM193B, C2orf47, TYW5, and CR1. Multivariate analysis of variance was applied to identify genetic variants associated with tau PET data in 3 regions of interests (composite regions of Braak I, Braak III/IV, and Braak V/VI stages) in women and men separately. We controlled for age, scanner manufacture, amyloid status, APOE ε4 carriership, diagnosis (CN vs MCI vs AD), and the first 10 genetic principal components to adjust for population stratification. Results We identified 3 genetic loci within 3 different genes associated with tau deposits specifically in women: rs79711283 within DNAJA2, rs113357081 within FERMT2, and rs74614106 within TYW5. In men, we also identified 3 loci within CR1 associated with tau deposits: rs115096248, rs113698814, and rs78150633. Discussion Our findings revealed sex-specific genetic variants associated with tau deposition independent of APOE ε4, amyloid status, and clinical diagnosis. These results provide potential molecular targets for understanding the mechanism of sex-specific tau aggregation and developing sex-specific gene-guided precision prevention or therapeutic interventions for AD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".