A study of pulsating behavior and stability parameter for one-dimensional non-ideal detonations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
One-dimensional numerical simulations of non-ideal detonations were performed by using inviscid reactive Euler equations. Chemical reactions in the equations were described by two-step consecutive irreversible reactions A → B → C, which include an exothermic step (A → B) followed by an endothermic step (B → C). Non-ideal detonations are achieved when endothermicity exists in the system. The periodic oscillation behavior of peak pressure during the propagation of a one-dimensional detonation wave was studied with the different exothermicity/endothermicity and different degrees of overdrive. The results show that the increase in exothermicity, the reduction in endothermicity, and the enhanced degrees of overdrive can stabilize the propagation of detonation waves. The influence of the exothermic reaction plays a dominant role for the stability of the one-dimensional non-ideal detonations, which is further confirmed by a theoretical analysis. In addition, the stability parameter χ, proposed originally by Radulescu “The propagation and failure mechanism of gaseous detonations: experiments in porous-walled tubes,” Ph.D. thesis (McGill University, Montreal, Canada, (2003), was extended to predict the stability of non-ideal detonations, based on the Zel'dovich–Neumann–Döring structure of the non-ideal detonations. The results show that the extended stability parameter can well match the stability boundary for all of cases in the present study.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".