Longitudinal hippocampal diffusion‐weighted imaging and T2 relaxometry demonstrate regional abnormalities which are stable and predict subfield pathology in temporal lobe epilepsy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: High-resolution (1 mm isotropic) diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) of the hippocampus in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients has shown patterns of hippocampal subfield diffusion abnormalities, which were consistent with hippocampal sclerosis (HS) subtype on surgical histology. The objectives of this longitudinal imaging study were to determine the stability of focal hippocampus diffusion changes over time in TLE patients, compare diffusion and quantitative T2 abnormalities of the sclerotic hippocampus, and correlate presurgical mean diffusivity (MD) and T2 maps with postsurgical histology. METHODS: T2 relaxometry scans (in a subset of 16 TLE patients and 9 controls) of the hippocampus at 3T, with a 2.6 ± 0.8 year inter-scan interval. Within-participant hippocampal volume, MD and T2 were compared between the scans. Contralateral hippocampal changes 2.3 ± 1.0 years after surgery and ipsilateral preoperative MD maps versus postoperative subfield histopathology were evaluated in eight patients who underwent surgical resection of the hippocampus. RESULTS: Reduced volume and elevated MD and T2 of sclerotic hippocampi remained unchanged between longitudinal scans. Focal regions of elevated MD and T2 in bilateral hippocampi of HS TLE were detected consistently at both scans. Regions of high MD and T2 correlated and remained consistent over time. Volume, MD, and T2 remained unchanged in postoperative contralateral hippocampus. Regional elevations of MD identified subfield neuron loss on postsurgical histology with 88% sensitivity and 88% specificity. Focal T2 elevations identified subfield neuron loss with 75% sensitivity and 88% specificity. SIGNIFICANCE: Diffusion and T2 abnormalities in ipsilateral and contralateral hippocampi remained unchanged between the scans suggesting permanent microstructural alterations. MD and T2 demonstrated good sensitivity and specificity to detect hippocampal subfield neuron loss on postsurgical histology, supporting the potential that high-resolution hippocampal DTI and T2 could be used to diagnose HS subtype before surgery.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".