Strong convergent inertial Tseng’s extragradient method for solving non-Lipschitz quasimonotone variational inequalities in Banach spaces
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The class of quasimonotone variational inequalities is more general and applicable than the class of pseudomonotone and monotone variational inequalities. However, few results can be found in the literature on quasimonotone variational inequalities and currently results are mostly on weak convergent methods in the framework of Hilbert spaces. In this paper, we study the class of non-Lipschitz quasimonotone variational inequalities and the class of non-Lipschitz variational inequalities without monotonicity in the framework of Banach spaces. We propose a new inertial Tseng's extragradient method and obtain some strong convergence results for the proposed algorithm under some mild conditions on the control parameters. While the cost operator is non-Lipschitz, our proposed method does not require any linesearch procedure but employs a more efficient and simple self-adaptive step sizes with known parameters. Finally, we present several numerical experiments to demonstrate the implementability of our proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it