MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311162637 · doi:10.18280/ts.390531

Application of Signal Imaging Analysis Technology in Prediction and Treatment of Water Inrush in Diversion Tunnel

2022· article· en· W4311162637 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeophysical Methods and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInrush currentGeologyGround-penetrating radarRadarSIGNAL (programming language)LithologyGeologic mapMining engineeringOverburdenReflection (computer programming)Remote sensingGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceGeomorphologyPetrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A signal imaging analysis technology was proposed to accurately interpret geological radar detection images in order to address the issues of difficult interpretation of radar advance forecast images of water inrush in diversion tunnels in unfavorable geological zones and difficult detection of grouting effects in grouting circles. The waveform, amplitude, and frequency differences in the radar data among various geological bodies in the fracture development zone, broken zone, and water-rich zone can be analyzed by the signal imaging analysis technology, which can extract multiple technical parameters for comprehensive judgment and provide a foundation for the interpretation of geological radar images. In this study, signal mapping analysis technology was used to interpret the geological detection images taken in front of the tunnel face and the surrounding rock geological detection map after cement-polyvinyl alcohol grouting, respectively. The accuracy of the signal mapping analysis technology was confirmed, and the following conclusions were drawn: (1) Geographic Different geological structures, such as fissure zones, broken zones, and water-rich zones, have different reflection signal properties for radar electromagnetic waves. With the help of the image, distinct geological features can be identified and water inrush can be anticipated; (2) Electronic scanning imaging can be used to observe it. The geological radar image feedback of the grouting circle after grouting indicates that the lithology of the grouting circle is complete and the grouting reinforcement and sealing effect is good when the cement-polyvinyl alcohol slurry concretion particles are dense; (3) The numerical analysis results of the seepage field of the tunnel demonstrate that the grouting of the surrounding rock can effectively reduce water seepage and control water gushing. The study's findings offer a specific reference point for the forecasting and management of water gushing in diversion tunnels located in adverse geological regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.593
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it