MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311164178 · doi:10.18280/ts.390540

CT Image Denoising Model Using Image Segmentation for Image Quality Enhancement for Liver Tumor Detection Using CNN

2022· article· en· W4311164178 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Venkateswarlu Gavini, Gurusamy Ramasamy Jothi Lakshmi

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicBrain Tumor Detection and Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceNoise reductionNon-local meansComputer visionNoise (video)Image restorationImage processingImage noiseInpaintingSpeckle noiseImage qualityPattern recognition (psychology)Image segmentationSegmentationImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Image denoising is an important concept in image processing for improving the image quality. It is difficult to remove noise from images because of the various causes of noise. Imaging noise is made up of many different types of noise, including Gaussian, impulse, salt, pepper, and speckle noise. Increasing emphasis has been paid to Convolution Neural Networks (CNNs) in image denoising. Image denoising has been researched using a variety of CNN approaches. For the evaluation of these methods, various datasets were utilized. Liver Tumor is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. By using Computed Tomography (CT) to detect liver tumor early, millions of patients could be spared from death each year. Denoising a picture means cleaning up an image that has been corrupted by unwanted noise. Due to the fact that noise, edge, and texture are all high frequency components, denoising can be tricky, and the resulting images may be missing some finer features. Applications where recovering the original image content is vital for good performance benefit greatly from image denoising, including image reconstruction, activity recognition, image restoration, segmentation techniques, and image classification. Tumors of this type are difficult to detect and are almost always discovered at an advanced stage, posing a serious threat to the patient's life. As a result, finding a tumour at an early stage is critical. Tumors can be detected non-invasively using medical image processing. There is a pressing need for software that can automatically read, detect, and evaluate CT scans by removing noise from the images. As a result, any system must deal with a bottleneck in liver segmentation and extraction from CT scans. To segment and classify liver CT images after denoising images, a deep CNN technique is proposed in this research. An Image Quality Enhancement model with Image Denoising and Edge based Segmentation (IQE-ID-EbS) is proposed in this research that effectively reduces noise levels in the image and then performs edge based segmentation for feature extraction from the CT images. The proposed model is compared with the traditional models and the results represent that the proposed model performance is better.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.114
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicBrain Tumor Detection and ClassificationFrench-language works237,207