MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311164445 · doi:10.18280/ts.390546

Data Compression and Noise Reduction in Smart Grid Using Discrete Wavelet Transform

2022· article· en· W4311164445 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rakhi Y. Jadhav, Anurag Mahajan

Bibliographic record

VenueTraitement du signal · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Compression Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSmart gridComputer scienceWaveletNoise reductionData compressionNoise (video)Wavelet transformDiscrete wavelet transformDistortion (music)Reduction (mathematics)Electronic engineeringReal-time computingAlgorithmEngineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematicsElectrical engineeringTelecommunicationsBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper proposed wavelet-based design using Discrete Wavelet Transform to compress smart grid electrical signals and to reduce noise. For the Smart Grid’s smooth functioning, the power signal must be monitored, and proper actions must be taken quickly for any abnormality. The compressed data takes less time to communicate the disturbances. The proposed design is tested for the phasor measurement unit, which monitors and records the status of the smart grid hence circulating extensive data to utilities, control centers, etc. It is also tested for load voltage data. Effective data compression can reduce the cost of data storage and transmission. Noise dramatically affects the effectiveness of the techniques detecting the disturbances. Hence data compression and denoising the data with minimum distortion is essential. The proposed design is simpler as it uses fewer filters and less number of decomposition level as compared to the existing design. Simulation results show that compression ratio and signal-to-noise ratios are increased as compared to existing design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.299
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTraitement du signalSame topicAdvanced Data Compression TechniquesFrench-language works237,207