MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311187468 · doi:10.1101/gr.276957.122

Rates and spectra of de novo structural mutations in <i>Chlamydomonas reinhardtii</i>

2022· article· en· W4311187468 on OpenAlexaff
Eugenio López‐Cortegano, Rory J. Craig, Jobran Chebib, Eniolaye J. Balogun, Peter D. Keightley

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Research · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Canadian institutionsAmgen (Canada)University of Toronto
FundersH2020 European Research CouncilBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilDirectorate for Biological SciencesEuropean Commission
KeywordsBiologyIndelGeneticsMutationChlamydomonas reinhardtiiMutation ratePseudogeneStructural variationINDEL MutationGenomeTransposable elementGeneMutantSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGenotype

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Genetic variation originates from several types of spontaneous mutation, including single-nucleotide substitutions, short insertions and deletions (indels), and larger structural changes. Structural mutations (SMs) drive genome evolution and are thought to play major roles in evolutionary adaptation, speciation, and genetic disease, including cancers. Sequencing of mutation accumulation (MA) lines has provided estimates of rates and spectra of single-nucleotide and indel mutations in many species, yet the rate of new SMs is largely unknown. Here, we use long-read sequencing to determine the full mutation spectrum in MA lines derived from two strains (CC-1952 and CC-2931) of the green alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii . The SM rate is highly variable between strains and between MA lines, and SMs represent a substantial proportion of all mutations in both strains (CC-1952 6%; CC-2931 12%). The SM spectra differ considerably between the two strains, with almost all inversions and translocations occurring in CC-2931 MA lines. This variation is associated with heterogeneity in the number and type of active transposable elements (TEs), which comprise major proportions of SMs in both strains (CC-1952 22%; CC-2931 38%). In CC-2931, a Crypton and a previously undescribed type of DNA element have caused 71% of chromosomal rearrangements, whereas in CC-1952, a Dualen LINE is associated with 87% of duplications. Other SMs, notably large duplications in CC-2931, are likely products of various double-strand break repair pathways. Our results show that diverse types of SMs occur at substantial rates, and support prominent roles for SMs and TEs in evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.701
Threshold uncertainty score0.268

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.303 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome ResearchSame topicGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFrench-language works237,207