Optical Parameters of the Tilia Cordata Mill. Assimilation Apparatus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Morphometric indicators of trees' assimilative apparatus, including their reflection and light-absorbing properties, largely determine their physiological processes. Leaf initiation and development depend on chlorophyll resulting from photosynthesis, water absorption, its movement through a tree and evaporation. The aim of the paper is to evaluate leaf optical properties of Tilia cordata Mill. It was found that optical coefficients of leaf blades vary depending on the time of sample collection: at the end of the growing season, the leaf blade absorptance (Ab) ranges from 68.9% to 72.4%. During the intensive formation of Tilia flowers, the Ab coefficient decreases to 59.2%. It starts to rise before the beginning of the Tilia fruit maturation. The transmittance, Tr, is also lower at the period of intense flower development. Estimating NDVI (vegetation index) and LAI (leaf area index) from Sentinel-2 satellite imagery showed that the ratio between these indices (NDVI-LAI) changes during the entire growing season. The NDVI-LAI correlation varied up to the strongest one during the entire phenological cycle.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".