MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Resource Optimization of SFC Embedding for IoT Networks Using Quantum Computing

2022· article· en· W4311417604 on OpenAlexaff
Mahzabeen Emu, Salimur Choudhury, Kai Salomaa

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuadratic unconstrained binary optimizationComputer scienceQuantum annealingScalabilityQuantum computerEmbeddingQubitDistributed computingInteger programmingOptimization problemSimulated annealingMathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceQuantumAlgorithmMathematicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Embedding Service Function Chain (SFC) into the massive and resource-hungry Internet of Things (IoT) substrate graph is a critical optimization research problem. Unfortunately, the classical Integer Linear Programming (ILP) formulation for such problems is usually NP-hard. Thus, this research study presses on the need to go beyond the realms and employ Quantum Annealing (QA) to speed up the computation. To comply, we reformulate the SFC embedding problem into IoT graphs as Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) format and propose a hybrid warm start quantum annealing (WSQA) optimization technique. Simulation results show that our proposed WSQA can improve resource utilization, accelerate computing time, and achieve a better scalability success rate at solving large-scale SFC deployment compared to standalone QA. Further along the line, this research inspires the application of quantum optimization for resource allocation in next-generation networks even with the limited availability of qubits.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.411
Threshold uncertainty score0.522

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureFrench-language works237,207