Bibliographic record
Abstract
The following papers were presented to the Canadian Society of Church History, but were not made available for publication: Royden Loewen ( “Snow Drift, Dust Bowl, Rain Forest: A Comparative Mennonite Environmental History”); Gerry Ediger (“Extending Bridges, Erecting Barriers, Exploiting Language: Manitoba Mennonite Brethren in the 1950s”); John J. Friesen (“The Changing Face of Manitoba Mennonites, 1870s to the present”); Tim Foran (“Frontiere decatholicite: Oblates and the Fashioning of Ethnic Relations in Catholic Parishes of Southern Alberta, 1905-1924”); Brian Gobbett (“The Descent of Man: John William Dawson and the Mosaic Interpretation of the Prehistoric Past”); Denise Fuchs (“The Letters of John Macallum at the Red River Academy”); Roderick MacLeod (“Proving ‘Worthy of Advancement’: Class, Gender, and Changing Expectations of Secondary Schooling in Anglo-Protestant Montreal”); Timothy G.Pearson (“Grace and Good Works: Jesuit Mission Teaching in the Relations, 1632-1650”); Sachiyo Takashima (“Charles Samuel Eby and the effort to establish an Interdenominational University in Japan”); and the presidential address by Gordon Heath (“‘Citizens of that Mighty Empire’: Imperial Sentiment among Students at Wesley College, 1897-1902”).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.706 | 0.560 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".