Bibliographic record
Abstract
The papers presented by Daniel Goodwin (“The Founding Vision of the Canadian Council of Churches”), Dennis R. Hoover (“The Politics of Conservative Protestant – Conservative Catholic Alliances in the United States and Canada”), Samuel Reimer (“The Ecumenical Impulse Among Canadians”), Bruce L. Guenther (“Slithering Down the Plank of Intellectualism? The Canadian Conference of Christian Educators and the Impulse Towards Accreditation Among Canadian Bible Schools During the 1960s”); Timothy E. Strauch (“The Jubilee Riots, the Orange Order and the Preservation of Protestantism in Toronto, 1875”), Colleen Gray (“Eighteenth-Century Clerical Biography and Narrative Technique in Imaging Sainthood: Two Biographers of Marie Barbier”), Douglas H. Shantz (“Pietists Representations of Sixteenth Century Radicals as found in the Works by Gottfried Arnold and Johann Heinrich Reitz”), Thomas Evans (“The ‘Englishness’ of John Medley, First Bishop of Fredericton, 1845-1892”), Russel Prime (“Trains, Boats and Magistrates: Disciples’ Evangelists Proclaiming the Gospel in the Maritimes, 1883-1903”), James Opp (“Re-imaging the Moral Order of Urban Space: Religion, Photography and the City”), Marguerite Van Die (“It Takes a Village: Evangelical Childhood Nurture and Moral Formation in Stanstead, Quebec, 1830-1880”), and Lynne Marks (“A God-Fearing Nation? Church Involvement Across Canada in 1901”) were not made available for publication.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.666 | 0.550 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".