Structural Determinants and Functional Significance of Dimerization for Osmosensing Transporter ProP in <i>Escherichia coli</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Osmosensing transporter ProP forestalls cellular dehydration by detecting environments with high osmotic pressure and mediating the accumulation of organic osmolytes by bacterial cells. It is composed of 12 transmembrane helices with cytoplasmic N- and C-termini. In Escherichia coli, dimers form when the C-terminal domains of ProP molecules form homodimeric, antiparallel, α-helical coiled coils. No dominant negative effect was detected when inactive and active ProP molecules formed heterodimers in vivo. Purification of ProP in detergent dodecylmaltoside yielded monomers, which were functional after reconstitution in proteoliposomes. With other evidence, this suggests that ProP monomers function independently whether in the monomeric or dimeric state. Amino acid replacements that disrupted or reversed the coiled coil did not prevent in vivo dimerization of ProP detected with a bacterial two-hybrid system. Maleimide labeling detected no osmolality-dependent variation in the reactivities of cysteine residues introduced to transmembrane helix (TM) XII. In contrast, coarse-grained molecular dynamic simulations detected deformation of the lipid around TMs III and VI, on the lipid-exposed protein surface opposite to TM XII. This suggests that the dimer interface of ProP includes the surfaces of TMs III and VI, not of TM XII as previously suggested by crosslinking data. Homology modeling suggested that coiled-coil formation and dimerization via such an interface are not mutually exclusive. In previous work, alterations to the C-terminal coiled coil blocked co-localization of ProP with phospholipid cardiolipin at E. coli cell poles. Thus, dimerization may contribute to ProP targeting, adjust its lipid environment, and hence indirectly modify its osmotic stress response.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".