Improvements in Efficacy Measures With Tafamidis in the Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) is a fatal disease. Tafamidis was approved to treat patients with ATTR-CM based on findings from the ATTR-ACT (Tafamidis in Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy Clinical Trial). Objectives: This post hoc analysis examined the proportion of patients who experienced improved efficacy measures through 30 months of treatment with tafamidis or placebo in ATTR-ACT. Methods: Patients with ATTR-CM were randomized to tafamidis (80 mg or 20 mg) or placebo. Change from baseline in 6-minute walk test distance, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary score, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration, patient global assessment of overall health, and New York Heart Association functional class were assessed at regular time points. The proportion of patients with improvement was summarized for each time point with odds ratio. Missing data were imputed as deterioration. Results: < 0.001) at month 30 for 6-minute walk test distance (4.9; 95% CI: 2.28-10.69), Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Overall Summary score (3.3; 95% CI: 1.85-5.78), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide concentration (5.3; 95% CI: 2.66-10.73), and patient global assessment of overall health (2.9; 95% CI: 1.69-4.95). Conclusions: This analysis found that higher proportions of patients treated with tafamidis experienced improvement from baseline in measures of heart failure, functional capacity, and health-related quality of life than those treated with placebo during ATTR-ACT. These data provide further evidence of the clinical benefits of tafamidis in patients with ATTR-CM. (Safety and Efficacy of Tafamidis in Patients With Transthyretin Cardiomyopathy [ATTR-ACT]; NCT01994889).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".