Nonwoven Hemostatic Dressings Formed by Contact Drawing of Interposed Polyethylene Oxide (PEO)‐Fibrinogen and PEO‐Thrombin Microfibers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Textiles containing interposed layers of polyethylene oxide (PEO)‐fibrinogen and PEO‐thrombin fibers are explored as biomaterials for hemostasis. The PEO‐fibrinogen and PEO‐thrombin fibers are formed by contact drawing, an approach that uses an entangled polymer solution and a pin array to form fibers by extension of liquid bridges. The interposition of the PEO‐fibrinogen and PEO‐thrombin fibers results in polymerization of a fibrin hydrogel mesh once the textile is hydrated. This fibrin hydrogel mesh displays the expected bands and diffraction peaks by Fourier‐transform infrared spectromicroscopy and X‐ray diffraction, respectively. The functionality of the hemostatic textiles formed from the interposed PEO‐fibrinogen and PEO‐thrombin fibers is demonstrated by analyzing human blood hemolysis, complement activation, protein adsorption, and platelet and leukocyte adhesion, indicating compatibility with human blood (hemolysis ratio <5%), with minimal inflammatory response (levels of terminal complement complex equivalent to plasma). The cytocompatibility and potential for cell remodeling of the fibrin hydrogel mesh formed by this process is evaluated with human dermal fibroblasts and human keratinocytes and it is found that both cell types attach and grow on the fibrin mesh. Finally, a whole blood clotting time of less than 30 s suggests a potential use of this material in hemorrhage control.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it