MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311481080 · doi:10.1016/j.preghy.2022.12.001

Correlation between cognitive assessment scores and circulating cerebral biomarkers in women with pre-eclampsia and eclampsia

2022· article· en· W4311481080 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePregnancy Hypertension · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPregnancy and preeclampsia studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersH2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie ActionsHorizon 2020European Research CouncilOlav Thon StiftelsenAlzheimerfondenNational Institutes of HealthSvenska LäkaresällskapetUK Dementia Research InstituteVetenskapsrådetHjärnfondenHorizon 2020 Framework ProgrammeSvenska Sällskapet för Medicinsk ForskningEU Joint Programme – Neurodegenerative Disease ResearchAlzheimer's AssociationMärta Lundqvists StiftelseEuropean CommissionFamiljen Erling-Perssons StiftelseStiftelsen för Gamla TjänarinnorAlzheimer's Drug Discovery FoundationSwedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education
KeywordsEclampsiaMedicineHELLP syndromeBiomarkerObstetricsPreeclampsiaCognitionInternal medicinePregnancyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: The cerebral injury biomarkers neurofilament light chain (NfL) and tau and the glial activation biomarker glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) may reflect neurological injury in pre-eclampsia. We assessed if there was a correlation between cognitive function assessment scores and plasma concentrations of these biomarkers in pre-eclampsia. STUDY DESIGN: Women with eclampsia, pre-eclampsia and normotensive pregnancies from the South African PROVE biobank were included. Blood samples were taken at inclusion. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment was performed after delivery at the time of discharge. The correlation between cognitive assessment scores and plasma concentrations of cerebral biomarkers was analysed using Spearman correlation adjusted for time from eclamptic seizure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We included 49 women with eclampsia, 16 women with pre-eclampsia complicated by pulmonary oedema, 22 women with pre-eclampsia without pulmonary oedema, HELLP or neurological complications and 18 women with normotensive pregnancies. RESULTS: There was a correlation between impaired cognitive function and increased plasma concentrations of NfL in women with eclampsia and women with pre-eclampsia and pulmonary oedema (r = -0.37, p = 0.009 and r = -0.56, p = 0.025 respectively). No correlation between impaired cognitive function and NfL in pre-eclampsia cases without pulmonary oedema, HELLP or neurological complications or normotensive pregnancies was found. No correlation with cognitive impairment was found in any groups for tau or GFAP. CONCLUSIONS: We found a correlation between impaired cognitive function assessment and plasma NfL concentrations in women with eclampsia and pre-eclampsia complicated by pulmonary oedema. These findings suggest that acute neuroaxonal injury may cause or contribute to cognitive impairment in these women.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.949

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it