PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN KAPOLS MOTIVASI DAN KINERJA ANGGOTA POLSEK JATIASIH
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Every organization needs a leader who can provide enthusiasm, guidance, direction on the performance of its employees/employees in achieving organizational goals. Leadership style and motivation have an important role in implementing performance for Village Government employees in the Lumajang District, Lumajang Regency, that there is an influence of leadership style and motivation simultaneously/partially on the performance of Kelurahan Government employees in Lumajang District, Lumajang Regency, the leadership style of the Kapolsek dominantly influences the performance of members of the Jatiasih Police, this shows the importance of leadership style and motivation to improve employee performance. If the leadership style and giving motivation are not paid attention to, then there will be a decrease in work performance/achievement. After conducting an evaluation, it can be concluded that there is a need to increase attention and policies towards members of the Jatiasih Polsek regarding performance, the problem of standard time which can still be said to be lacking and must design motivation for good members to be able to achieve organizational goals
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.022 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".