MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311525856 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.169

2362. Adoption and Utilization of Social Media among Adult and Pediatric Infectious Diseases Divisions and Fellowship Programs in the United States and Canada

2022· article· en· W4311525856 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jonathan H. Ryder, Clayton Mowrer, Zachary Van Roy, Elizabeth Lyden, Kelly Cawcutt, Jasmine R Marcelin

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Media in Health Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSocial mediaMedicinePandemicCoronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)Family medicineInfectious disease (medical specialty)DiseaseWorld Wide WebInternal medicineComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Social media (SoMe) is used by 72% of US adults. The utility of SoMe for infectious diseases (ID) has been highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Adoption and utilization of SoMe by ID divisions is not well characterized. Methods We conducted a systematic search strategy for US and Canadian ID fellowship/division SoMe accounts – specifically Twitter, Facebook (FB), and Instagram (IG) – in November-December 2021. We collected data from program websites, SoMe accounts, and NRMP and FREIDA databases. Primary outcome was ID SoMe account prevalence. Secondary outcomes included measures of SoMe characteristics, adoption, and activity comparing adult and pediatric programs. We reported descriptive statistics. Results Of 243 ID programs in the US and Canada, 170 (70%) are adult and 73 (30%) are pediatric with 222 (91.4%) programs in the US. Twitter, FB, and IG accounts were found for 70 (31.5%), 14 (6.3%) and 14 (6.3%) US programs, respectively (Table 1); 2/21 (9.5%) Canadian programs had a SoMe account (Twitter). Twitter accounts were associated with larger programs and higher match rates (Table 2). SoMe activity and engagement before and during IDWeek 2021 is in Table 3. More adult programs had Twitter accounts (37.3% vs 17.2%, p=0.004), but utilization was similar between adult and pediatric programs. Most Twitter posts were educational (1653/2859, 57.8%); FB primarily promotional (68/128, 53.1%); IG mostly social (34/79, 43%). COVID-19 related posts were found in 821/2859 (28.7%) Twitter posts, 33/128 (25.8%) FB posts, and 5/79 (6.3%) Instagram posts. FB was the earliest adopted SoMe platform for ID, but Twitter and IG have more recent growth. The rate of Twitter account creation increased from 0.35 accounts/month prior to March 2020 (COVID pandemic declaration) to 1.95 accounts/month after March 2020. 71.4% (10/14) of IG accounts were created after March 2020. Conclusion SoMe remains underutilized across all ID divisions, but COVID-19 and virtual recruiting may have influenced recent account creation (Figure 1). Twitter is the most frequently used ID program SoMe platform in comparison to FB and IG, and use increased during IDWeek. ID divisions should embrace the digital and SoMe space with benefits for recruitment and amplification of their trainees, faculty, and specialty. Disclosures Jasmine R. Marcelin, MD, Pfizer/Mayo Clinic Global Bridges: Honoraria.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0060.011
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicSocial Media in Health EducationFrench-language works237,207