Genome sequencing of<i>C. elegans</i>balancer strains reveals previously unappreciated complex genomic rearrangements
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genetic balancers in Caenorhabditis elegans are complex variants that allow lethal or sterile mutations to be stably maintained in a heterozygous state by suppressing crossover events. Balancers constitute an invaluable tool in the C. elegans scientific community and have been widely used for decades. The first/traditional balancers were created by applying X-rays, UV, or gamma radiation on C. elegans strains, generating random genomic rearrangements. Their structures have been mostly explored with low-resolution genetic techniques (e.g., fluorescence in situ hybridization or PCR), before genomic mapping and molecular characterization through sequencing became feasible. As a result, the precise nature of most chromosomal rearrangements remains unknown, whereas, more recently, balancers have been engineered using the CRISPR-Cas9 technique for which the structure of the chromosomal rearrangement has been predesigned. Using short-read whole-genome sequencing (srWGS) and tailored bioinformatic analyses, we previously interpreted the structure of four chromosomal balancers randomly created by mutagenesis processes. Here, we have extended our analyses to five CRISPR-Cas9 balancers and 17 additional traditional balancing rearrangements. We detected and experimentally validated their breakpoints and have interpreted the balancer structures. Many of the balancers were found to be more intricate than previously described, being composed of complex genomic rearrangements (CGRs) such as chromoanagenesis-like events. Furthermore, srWGS revealed additional structural variants and CGRs not known to be part of the balancer genomes. Altogether, our study provides a comprehensive resource of complex genomic variations in C. elegans and highlights the power of srWGS to study the complexity of genomes by applying tailored analyses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".