MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

643: ESTIMATING THE GLOBAL PREVALENCE OF PEDIATRIC ACUTE CRITICAL ILLNESS IN RESOURCE-LIMITED SETTINGS

2022· article· en· W4311557044 on OpenAlexaff
Firas Sakaan, Adrian Holloway, Qalab Abbas, John Adabie Appiah, Jonah E. Attebery, Paula Caporal, Ericka L. Fink, Niranjan Kissoon, Jan Hau Lee, Eliana López, Srinivas Murthy, Fiona Muttalib, Kenneth E. Remy, Karla Emília de Sá Rodrigues, Adriana Teixeira Rodrigues, A.V. Saint Andre-Vonarnim, Matthew O. Wiens, Asya Agulnik, Adnan Bhutta, Teresa Kortz

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Care Medicine · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaBC Children's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineObservational studyCritical illnessPediatric intensive care unitIntensive careEmergency medicineIntensive care medicineIntensive care unitMechanical ventilationSeverity of illnessPediatricsCritically illInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: Globally, Most pediatric critical illness is managed outside of formal intensive care units, as such we lack an understanding of the true prevalence of pediatric critical illness. Global PARITY (Pediatric Acute cRitical Illness point prevalence sTudY) is a prospective, observational, international study designed to measure prevalence of and outcomes associated with pediatric acute critical illness in resource-limited settings. We hypothesized that availability of pediatric critical care resources (formal and informal) impacts clinical outcomes. Data collection completes in Sep 2022; here we describe preliminary findings. Methods: Children 29 days-14 years with acute illness or injury presenting to a hospital in RLS settings were enrolled during 4 sampling periods over 12 months. Participating centers were not required to have a dedicated pediatric ICU. Admitted children were followed for clinical outcomes and critical care resource utilization. The primary outcome was prevalence of acute critical illness, defined as death within 48 hrs of presentation, need for a higher level of care, or requiring intensive care resources (e.g., Vasoactive). Results: study launched in July 2021 with 63 centers; 47 centers completed >3 data collection periods and over 7000 subjects were enrolled. Data completion and quality review for the 4 sampling periods are underway. A subset of data showed the availability of intensive care units: Pediatric high dependency/intermediate care unit (33, 52.4%), PICU (45, 71.4%), Pediatric beds in adult ICU (8, 12.7%), another subset of data showed patient utilization; Invasive Mechanical Ventilation requirement (N=8055): Yes (48, 0.6%), Vasoactives use: Yes (83, 1.0%). admission location (N=885): Inpatient Ward (600, 67.8%), High-Dependency Unit (266, 30.1%), Intermediate Care Unit (6, 0.7%), Intensive Care Unit (6, 0.7%). Conclusions: The majority of sites reported having a formal PICU. However, resource availability varies significantly between PICUs and this analysis, as well as the association between resources and outcomes, is in process. Global PARITY is a necessary step in determining the global burden of pediatric critical illness and availability of critical care resources; it will provide important insights regarding future resource investment and allocation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.327 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Care Medicine→Same topicTrauma and Emergency Care Studies→French-language works237,207→