MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311601942 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1308

1678. Activity of mecillinam against urinary tract clinical isolates from the United States during 2017-2020 including isolates resistant to comparator antibiotics and multi-drug resistant isolates

2022· article· en· W4311601942 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stephen Hawser, Nimmi Kothari, Federica Monti, Anne Santerre Henriksen

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicUrinary Tract Infections Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMecillinamFosfomycinNitrofurantoinMedicineMicrobiologyAntibioticsCiprofloxacinTrimethoprimBiologyEscherichia coliEnterobacteriaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Mecillinam is a first-in-class amidinopenicillin antibiotic, being the only β-lactam to exert its antibacterial activity through exclusive binding to penicillin-binding protein 2. Pivmecillinam is the oral prodrug of mecillinam recommended as a first-line therapy by the Infectious Disease Society of America guidelines for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) and is approved for the treatment of uUTI in Europe and Canada though not yet in the USA. To support the clinical development of mecillinam and pivmecillinam in the USA for the treatment of cUTI and uUTI, this study investigated the activity of mecillinam compared with other antibiotics against Enterobacterales isolates from patients with UTI in the US during 2017-2020 Methods A total of 3303 Enterobacterales clinical isolates from UTIs from hospitals throughout the USA during 2017-2020 were tested. MIC tests were performed by agar dilution in line with CLSI susceptibility testing standards. Results Overall, susceptibility was highest for fosfomycin (97.1% susceptible) and mecillinam (94.9% susceptible). Against isolates resistant to ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, fosfomycin, nitrofurantoin and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole susceptibility to mecillinam was high with 89.6 %, 90.9 %, 82.4 %, 86.7 % and 93.6 %, respectively. Only fosfomycin exhibited similar activity to mecillinam. The most active antibiotics against MDR Enterobacterales were fosfomycin (86% susceptible) and mecillinam (79.2 % susceptible). Of the 288 MDR Enterobacterales, the majority were E. coli (n = 128) and K. pneumoniae (n = 103). The most active agents against MDR E. coli and MDR K. pneumoniae were fosfomycin and mecillinam that had susceptibilities of 93.8 % and 92.2 % and 79.6 % and 72.8 %, respectively. Conclusion Mecillinam exhibited promising activity against the majority of Enterobacterales tested. The drug was notably active against isolates resistant to antibiotics in routine clinical use and notably was similarly active against many MDR isolates. The data from our study strongly support the clinical utility of mecillinam and pivmecillinam in the USA for the treatment of cUTI and uUTI. Disclosures Anne Santerre Henriksen, PhD, UTILITY therapeutics Ltd: Advisor/Consultant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicUrinary Tract Infections ManagementFrench-language works237,207