MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311615135 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.456

378. Utility of CMV Quantitative PCR in Tissue Biopsy for the Diagnosis of CMV Gastrointestinal Disease among Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

2022· article· en· W4311615135 on OpenAlexaff
Lucila Baldassarre, Camille Pelletier Vernooy, Me‐Linh Luong

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHistopathologyBiopsyMedicineCytomegalovirusGold standard (test)PathologyInternal medicineViral diseaseImmunologyHerpesviridaeVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is an important cause of morbidity after solid organ transplantation (SOT). Rapid and accurate diagnosis of gastrointestinal (GI) CMV disease is central to the early initiation of appropriate therapy. Currently, the diagnosis mainly relies on histopathology on formalin-fixed GI tissue biopsy. CMV diagnosis by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) on tissue biopsy is not routinely performed for the diagnosis of tissue invasive disease, but potentially holds many practical advantages over the gold standard including a rapid turnaround time and providing a quantitative objective result. Methods We compared the performance of CMV qPCR on fresh GI biopsy with tissue biopsy histopathology for the diagnosis of GI CMV disease. Results A total of 62 SOT patients with GI symptoms underwent endoscopic assessment with GI biopsy analyses for both histopathology and tissue CMV qPCR. Twelve patients (19.4%) had proven CMV disease on histopathology. Among them, all had a positive qPCR on biopsy (median value of log 7.7 and 5.4 x107 copies/mL), and all had a positive serum CMV PCR (median value of log 4.5 and 3.4 x104 copies/mL). Of the 49 remaining patients with negative histopathology, 26 (53%) had CMV qPCR positive tissue biopsy specimens with a median log 4.3 and 2.0 x104 copies/mL. Of these 26 patients with histopathology negative/CMV qPCR positive tissue biopsies, 10 had positive serum CMV qPCR. Twenty-four patients were negative for all three tests: histopathology, CMV qPCR on tissue biopsy, and CMV viremia. ROC analysis for optimal threshold value for CMV qPCR on tissue biopsy for diagnosis of confirmed CMV GI disease is 104 824 copies/mL (sensitivity 100%, specificity 82%, area under ROC 0.91). Conclusion Our study shows that tissue biopsy CMV qPCR is highly sensitive (sensitivity of 100%) for the diagnosis of CMV GI disease. As such, tissue CMV qPCR may be a useful adjunctive diagnostic tool for the rapid diagnosis of CMV GI disease. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus researchFrench-language works237,207