Stimulus information guides the emergence of behavior related signals in primary somatosensory cortex during learning
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT Cortical neurons in primary sensory cortex carry not only sensory but also behavior-related information. However, it remains unclear how these types of information emerge and are integrated with one another over learning and what the relative contribution of activity in individual cells versus neuronal populations is in this process. Current evidence supports two opposing views of learning-related changes: 1) sensory information increases in primary cortex or 2) sensory information remains stable in primary cortex but its readout efficiency in association cortices increases. Here, we investigate these questions in primary sensory cortex during learning of a sensory task. Over the course of weeks, we imaged neuronal activity at different depths within layers 2 and 3 of the mouse vibrissal primary somatosensory cortex (vS1) before, during, and after training on a whisker-based object-localization task. We leveraged information theoretical analysis to quantify stimulus and behavior-related information in vS1 and estimate how much neural activity encoding sensory information is used to inform perceptual choices as sensory learning progresses. We also quantified the extent to which these types of information are supported by an individual neuron or population code. We found that, while sensory information rises progressively from the start of training, choice information is only present in the final stages of learning and is increasingly supported by a population code. Moreover, we demonstrate that not only the increase in available information, but also a more efficient readout of such information in primary sensory cortex mediate sensory learning. Together, our results highlight the importance of primary cortical neurons in perceptual learning.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".