Bava & Leone: The “Spaghettification” of the American Cinematic Form
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the 1960s two Italian filmmakers, Mario Bava and Sergio Leone, released a string of notable films that directly challenged and re-framed the revered American genres of horror and the western respectively. Their revisualization and ultimate reinterpretation of these traditional genres reached its zenith with the release of Bava’s Black Sabbath (1963) and Leone’s Once Upon a Time in the West (1968). They marked the dawn of a “spaghettification” of the American cinematic form. This paper argues that the “spaghettification” of the horror and western genres within Black Sabbath and Once Upon a Time in the West redefined the visual calculus of these American genres and revitalized their core tenets, cementing a new cinematic approach to them. Their use of cinematic close-ups, operatic scores, technicolour cinematography, and subversion of the American icon through the casting of Boris Karloff and Henry Fonda established a bold new cinematic style that reshaped the classic American form. This analysis will also note that the motivation behind this visual reformulation was wholly divergent, as Bava embraced his low-budget circumstances to relish the absurdity inherent in the horror genre, while Leone sought to establish a “New West” that was emblematic of the violence and bigotry of the American frontier. The cinematic style of these two films were primarily motivated by a love for the American classics and their revitalization of these classic genres would permeate in the minds of many budding auteurs such as Quentin Tarantino and Martin Scorsese, who in turn would go on to further rejuvenate the American cinematic landscape. Keywords: Sergio Leone, Mario Bava, Western, Horror, Italian, American, Cinema
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".