Engineered human organ-specific urethra as a functional substitute
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urologic patients may be affected by pathologies requiring surgical reconstruction to re-establish a normal function. The lack of autologous tissues to reconstruct the urethra led clinicians toward new solutions, such as tissue engineering. Tridimensional tissues were produced and characterized from a clinical perspective. The balance was optimized between increasing the mechanical resistance of urethral-engineered tissue and preserving the urothelium's barrier function, essential to avoid urine extravasation and subsequent inflammation and fibrosis. The substitutes produced using a mix of vesical (VF) and dermal fibroblasts (DF) in either 90%:10% or 80%:20% showed mechanical resistance values comparable to human native bladder tissue while maintaining functionality. The presence of mature urothelium markers such as uroplakins and tight junctions were documented. All substitutes showed similar histological features except for the noticeable decrease in polysaccharide globules for the substitutes made with a higher proportion of DF. The degree of maturation evaluated with electron microscopy was positively correlated with the increased concentration of VF in the stroma. Substitutes produced with VF and at least 10% of DF showed sufficient mechanical resistance to withstand surgeon manipulation and high functionality, which may improve long-term patients' quality of life, representing a great future alternative to current treatments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".