Lung protection strategy with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation improves respiratory outcomes at two years in preterm respiratory distress syndrome: a before and after, quality improvement study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) remains one of the major challenges of extreme prematurity. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) with volume guarantee (HFOV-VG) can be used as an early-rescue ventilation to protect developing lungs. However, the studies exploring the impact of this ventilatory strategy on neonatal respiratory morbidity are very limited. This study aimed at documenting the improvement in respiratory outcomes in mechanically ventilated preterm newborns, after the implementation of a new mechanical ventilation respiratory bundle.Methods A prospective, quality improvement study was conducted between January 2012 and December 2018 in a third level NICU in Madrid, Spain. Infants born <32 weeks of gestation with severe respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) and requiring invasive mechanical ventilation were included. The intervention consisted of a new ventilation respiratory care bundle, with HFOV as early rescue therapy using low high-frequency tidal volumes (Vthf) and higher frequencies (15–20 Hz). Criteria for HFOV start were impaired oxygenation or ventilation on conventional ventilation, or peak inspiratory pressures >15 cmH2O. Two cohorts of mechanically ventilated patients were compared, cohort 1 (2012–2013, baseline period) and cohort 2 (2016–2018, after implementation of the new bundle). Clinical outcomes at 36 weeks and 2 years of postmenstrual age were compared between the groups.Results A total of 216 patients were included, the median gestational age was 26 weeks (IQR 25–28) and median birth weight was 895 g (IQR 720–1160). There were no significant differences in survival between the groups, but patients with the protective ventilation strategy (cohort 2) had higher survival without BPD 2–3 (OR 2.93, 95%CI 1.41–6.05). At 2 years of postmenstrual age, patients in cohort 2 also had a higher survival free of baseline respiratory treatment and hospital respiratory admissions than the control group (adjusted OR 2.33, 95%CI 1.10–4.93, p=.03). The results did not suggest significant differences in neurologic development.Conclusions In extreme premature related severe respiratory failure, the use of a lung protective HFOV-VG strategy was proven to be a useful quality improvement intervention in our unit, leading to better pulmonary outcomes at 36 weeks and additional improved respiratory prognosis at two years of age.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.012 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".