MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4311701886 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs221610748

Predictors of in-Hospital Prognosis after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Requiring Mechanical Support Devices

2022· article· en· W4311701886 on OpenAlexaff
Nasir Ali, Rizwan Ullah, Saeed Maqsood, Tariq Ahmed, Shahzad Khatti, Rabnawaz Khan, Tahir Saghir

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntra-aortic balloon pumpMyocardial infarctionCardiologyConventional PCIInternal medicineTIMIPercutaneous coronary interventionThrombolysisCoronary artery diseaseIntra-Aortic Balloon PumpingBalloonPercutaneousCardiogenic shock

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objectives: The study was designed to identify predictor variables of the hospitalized patient’s primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) for MI needing mechanical support systems including some intra-aortic balloon-pumping and percutaneous cardiopulmonary. However, these predictors are still unknown. Place and Duration: The research was carried out at National Institute of Cardiovascular Disease with the duration from 5th September 2021 to 5th March 2022. Methodology: Clinical history, angiographic research results, primary PCI outcomes, as well as in hospital prognosis were retroactively evaluated by comparing primary PCI treated acute myocardial infarction patients needing mechanical aid devices (with intra-aortic balloon pump patient populations, n=550) versus those without (IABP patients, n=755). In comparison to individuals without IABP, those with intra-aortic balloon pump were much more inclined to have a greater proportion of diseased vessels, a lower TIMI score in the infarct related artery (IRA), and a considerably high death rate of hospitalized patients. On multivariate analysis, possession of Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction greater than or equal to 3 flow in the infarct-related artery right after PPCI was the poor indicator in the without intra-aortic balloon pump patients, in contrast to the patients with IABP. The percentage of diseased vessels or diseased left main trunk at preliminary cardiac catheterization was the impartial predictive factor of the hospitalized patient’s fatalities in the sufferers with IABP, but not in the sufferers without intra-aortic balloon pump. Results: A significant risk factor for fatality in hospitalized patients in PPCI-treated acute myocardial infarction patients needing mechanical assistance devices is the proportion of diseased vessels ≥ 2 or diseased left main trunk at baseline CAG. Keywords: Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support; Intra-aortic balloon pumping, PPCI or primary percutaneous coronary intervention; Multi-vessel disease

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCoronary Interventions and Diagnostics→French-language works237,207→