MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311702280 · doi:10.1112/jlms.12702

Quantum edge correspondences and quantum Cuntz–Krieger algebras

2022· article· en· W4311702280 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Brannan, Mitch Hamidi, Lara Ismert, Brent Nelson, Mateusz Wasilewski

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the London Mathematical Society · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersEuropean Research CouncilFonds Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsVertex (graph theory)QuotientAdjacency matrixGraphQuantumDiscrete mathematicsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Given a quantum graph G=(B,ψ,A)${\mathcal {G}}=(B,\psi ,A)$, we define a C*-correspondence EG$E_{\mathcal {G}}$ over the non-commutative vertex C*-algebra B$B$, called the quantum edge correspondence. For a classical graph G${\mathcal {G}}$, EG$E_{\mathcal {G}}$ is the usual graph correspondence spanned by the edges of G${\mathcal {G}}$. When the quantum adjacency matrix A:B→B$A\colon B\rightarrow B$ is completely positive, we show that EG$E_{\mathcal {G}}$ is faithful if and only if ker⁡(A)$\ker (A)$ does not contain a central summand of B$B$. In this case, we show that the Cuntz–Pimsner algebra OEG${\mathcal {O}}_{E_{\mathcal {G}}}$ is isomorphic to a quotient of the quantum Cuntz–Krieger algebra O⁡(G)${\mathcal {O}}({\mathcal {G}})$ defined in Brannan, Eifler, Voigt, and Weber (Trans. Am. Math. Soc. Ser. B 9 (2022), 782–826). Moreover, the kernel of the quotient map is shown to be generated by “localized” versions of the quantum Cuntz–Krieger relations, and OEG${\mathcal {O}}_{E_{\mathcal {G}}}$ is shown to be the universal object associated to these local relations. We study in detail some concrete examples and make connections with the theory of Exel crossed products.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.099
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.292 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the London Mathematical SocietySame topicAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchFrench-language works237,207