1689. <i>In Vitro</i> Activity of Lefamulin Against Bacterial Pathogens Collected From Pneumonia Patients in United States and Latin America Medical Centers in 2020-2021
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Lefamulin is a novel pleuromutilin protein synthesis inhibitor approved in the US, Canada, and Europe for the oral and intravenous treatment of community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) in adults due to typical and atypical pathogens. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of lefamulin and comparators against bacterial isolates from patients with community-acquired respiratory tract infections and hospitalized patients with pneumonia in the US and Latin America. Methods 1,907 unique isolates were collected within the SENTRY surveillance program from 29 medical centers in the US and 8 medical centers in Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Panama). Isolates were susceptibility tested by CLSI reference broth microdilution methods. CLSI breakpoints (M100, 2022) were applied. Results Lefamulin inhibited 100% of S. pneumoniae isolates at or below its susceptible (S) breakpoint of ≤ 0.5 mg/L, regardless of resistance to other antibiotics used to treat CABP (MIC90 values of 0.12 or 0.25 mg/L, Table). The penicillin-resistant (R; 12.7%), azithromycin-R (43.7%), and tetracycline-R S. pneumoniae (20.4%) displayed reduced susceptibility to the other CABP drugs tested, except moxifloxacin ( > 98.2% S) and lefamulin (100% S). Lefamulin was highly potent against S. aureus, including MRSA, azithromycin-R, and moxifloxacin-R isolates, with 100% of isolates inhibited at or below the lefamulin S breakpoint of ≤ 0.25 mg/L. Susceptibility to azithromycin and moxifloxacin was particularly low for MRSA (13.9% and 25.0%, respectively). The fastidious Gram-negative H. influenzae and M. catarrhalis, of which 24.0% and 98.8%, respectively, were ß-lactamase positive, were S to lefamulin ( > 93%) and the other tested CABP drugs ( > 89%). Table. Susceptibility of pneumonia pathogens from US and Latin America to lefamulin and other CABP drugs Conclusion Lefamulin displayed potent in vitro activity against contemporary CABP pathogens from the US and Latin America. Its activity was unaffected by resistance to other antibiotic classes, including fluoroquinolones, macrolides, β-lactams, and tetracyclines. Lefamulin represents a valuable empiric treatment option for ambulatory and hospitalized patients with CABP, particularly when the causative pathogen is not identified or in settings with high prevalence of resistance. Disclosures Susanne Paukner, PhD, Nabriva Therapeutics: Inventor|Nabriva Therapeutics: Employee|Nabriva Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds SJ Ryan Arends, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support Rodrigo E. Mendes, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Office for Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Shionogi: Grant/Research Support|Spero Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support Steven P. Gelone, PharmD, Nabriva Therapeutics: Board Member|Nabriva Therapeutics: Inventor|Nabriva Therapeutics: Employee|Nabriva Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Nabriva Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds Helio S. Sader, MD, PhD, AbbVie: Grant/Research Support|Cidara: Grant/Research Support|Melinta: Grant/Research Support|Nabriva Therapeutics: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".