1784. Appropriateness of Intravenous Vancomycin in a Canadian Acute Care Hospital
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Background Intravenous (IV) vancomycin is a commonly prescribed antimicrobial. However, there is limited literature assessing IV vancomycin appropriateness. The objective of the study was to assess the appropriateness of IV vancomycin prescriptions in a Canadian acute care hospital. Methods Prospective audit and feedback (PAF) was conducted on all new IV vancomycin prescriptions in hospitalized adults (age ≥ 18 years) at the University of Alberta Hospital from January 17 to February 11, 2022. Appropriateness was assessed against institutional prescribing guidelines (Bugs & Drugs® and Alberta Health Services Formulary Prescribing Guidelines). Verbal and written feedback were provided to the attending teams. Results A total of 109 prescriptions were audited. Median age was 57 (IQR 43-72) years and 42% were female. 65 (60%) were admitted to Medicine, 18 (17%) to Surgery, and 26 (24%) to Intensive Care units. MRSA colonization was present in 32 (29%) patients, β-lactam allergy recorded in 21 (19%), and acute kidney injury (AKI) in 21 (19%). Infectious Diseases consultation (IDC) occurred in 29 (27%). The top indications were skin and soft tissue, pulmonary, and bloodstream infections (Table 1); 70% of prescriptions were empiric in nature. Overall, 43 (39%) prescriptions were assessed to be suboptimal. Antimicrobial Stewardship program (ASP) recommendations were made in 56 prescriptions, totaling 63 unique recommendations. Vancomycin was recommended to be discontinued in 24 (43%) cases or changed to a different agent in 15 (27%). Regimen optimization (duration or frequency change) was recommended in 4 (7%). ASP recommended investigations in 8 cases and IDC in 12. Full or partial acceptance was achieved in 49 cases (88%). IDC was associated with greater appropriateness (83% vs 53%, p=0.004) as was MRSA colonization (75% vs 55%, p=0.047), but AKI was not (62% vs 60%, p=0.888). Adjusting for age, AKI, and MRSA colonization, IDC remained a significant predictor of vancomycin appropriateness (OR=4.27, [95%CI 1.44-12.70]; p=0.009). Conclusion IV vancomycin prescriptions were suboptimal in 39% of cases. IDC was associated with increased appropriateness. This pilot informs the need for antimicrobial stewardship intervention and the importance of IDC at our center. Disclosures Dima Kabbani, MD, MSc, AVIR Pharma: Grant/Research Support|AVIR Pharma: Honoraria|GSK: Honoraria|Merck: Grant/Research Support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.011 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".