MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311744989 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.236

158. Adherence to use of blood cultures according to current national guidelines and their impact in patients with community acquired pneumonia: A retrospective cohort

2022· article· en· W4311744989 on OpenAlexaff
Rafael E Ruiz Gaviria, Arturo Marroquín-Rivera, Maria D Pardi, Robert W. Ross

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCommunity-acquired pneumoniaRetrospective cohort studyPneumoniaCohortBlood cultureDiabetes mellitusCohort studyInternal medicineDiseasePediatricsIntensive care medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Community acquired pneumonia(CAP) is one of the highest infectious causes of mortality. Recommendations about the use of blood cultures in the diagnosis and treatment of CAP has been a continuous topic of debate. Current guidelines specify the situations when blood cultures should be ordered. Methods A retrospective cohort in a teaching hospital in Baltimore USA was conducted that include all the patients that were admitted with diagnosis of CAP as per the International Disease Classification 10 ( ICD 10) between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2019. Socio demographic and clinical characteristics were obtained, as well as length of hospital stay and mortality. Blood cultures were classified as positive or negative and at the same time it was evaluated if they were done in compliance with current recommendations of Infectious Disease Society of America ( IDSA) Results 721 patients had CAP and were included in the study. Median age was 68 years and almost 50% of the patients were male (n= 293). Most of the patients were from home (84%) and the most common comorbidities were hypertension and diabetes ( 68% and 31 % respectively). 96 patients had positive blood culture and 34% (n= 247) of all the blood cultures were adequately ordered as per current IDSA guidelines. 80 patients died or went to hospice and the median length of stay in our cohort was of 7 days. The multivariate model showed that mortality was associated with positive blood cultures ( OR= 3.1 95%CI 1.63- 5.87)and appropriateness of blood cultures ( OR=2.96 95% CI 1.25.7). Length of hospital stay did not show any association with positive blood cultures, but it was associated with blood culture appropriateness (OR= 1.63 95% CI 1-2.65). Relation bewteen BC and LOS Relationship between appropriateness of BC and length of stay according to the positivity of the BC Multivariate with final disposition Multivariate logistic regression to assess the association with mortality Multivariate length of stay Multivariate logistic regression to assess the association with extended length of stay Conclusion Adequate use of blood cultures in patients with CAP might have some association in the outcomes of patients suffering from this condition. However, a prospective study evaluating the utility of this test following current IDSA recommendations is needed to understand their impact in mortality and morbidity of CAP Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.412

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingFrench-language works237,207