MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311750278 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1443

1813. A Population-Based Multi-Year Assessment of the Incidence of High Inoculum Cefazolin (CZ) Resistance Amongst Methicillin-Susceptible <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (MSSA) Causing Bloodstream Infections (BSIs) over time in Calgary, Canada

2022· article· en· W4311750278 on OpenAlexaffabout
Kristine Du, Barbara J. Waddell, Chloe Ligier, Julianna Svishchuk, Alexander Kipp, John C. Lam, Stephen Robinson, Ranjani Somayaji, John Conly, Daniel B. Gregson, Michael D. Parkins

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Canadian institutionsSaint John Regional HospitalDalhousie UniversityUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCefazolinIncidence (geometry)PopulationBroth microdilutionStaphylococcus aureusMinimum inhibitory concentrationCeftazidimeTolerabilityMicrobiologyInternal medicineAntibioticsVeterinary medicineAdverse effectBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Cefazolin (CZ) is a 1st-line therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections due to its tolerability, lower toxicity, and convenient dosing. However, some strains exhibit reduced susceptibility to CZ when present in high inoculum. Treatment failure and worsened outcomes are documented in BSI cohorts treated with CZ when infections are caused by strains demonstrating this inoculum effect (IE) (Miller, 2018). The objective of our study was to investigate the incidence of MSSA strains demonstrating IE over time across a general population, free of referral bias. Methods All initial isolates of first episodes of MSSA BSI from persons in Calgary, Canada were analyzed during 2012-14 and 2019. CZ minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) was determined at standard (SI: 5x105 CFU/mL) and high inocula (HI: 5x107 CFU/mL) using the broth microdilution method at 24 hours as per 2009 CLSI criteria. Isolates were defined as having the CZ IE if they had a ≥ 4-fold difference between MIC at SI and HI. Isolates were defined as having a pronounced IE (pIE), if they were susceptible at SI but resistant at HI with an MIC ≥ 32µg/mL. Population density of Calgary was obtained from census data. Annual incidence rates (IR) were calculated by dividing the number of IE and pIE by the mid-year population data, and IR ratios (IRR) were calculated for IE and pIE by comparing 2019 to 2012 rates. Results During the years of study, 1040 individuals experienced at least one episode of MSSA BSI. The mean incidence rates of IE and pIE were 6.50 and 0.98 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Comparing 2019 to 2012, rates of IE decreased significantly with an IRR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.47 – 0.95) but rates of pIE were not significantly different (IRR 1.24; 95% CI 0.43 – 3.86). Incidence rates of IE and pIE in Calgary, Canada in 2012-14 and 2019. MSSA BSIs in Calgary, Canada over the years are shown alongside corresponding rates of IE and pIE. The population density was used to find rates for IE/pIE per 100,000 person-years. Conclusion Population-based studies on MSSA BSI with the IE and pIE phenotype are lacking. Herein, we observed that while the incidence of MSSA with pIE has not changed, those occurring with the IE have decreased. Further studies on the clinical implications of pIE are needed. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntimicrobial Resistance in StaphylococcusFrench-language works237,207