MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4311755506 · doi:10.1093/ofid/ofac492.1350

1720. <i>In Vitro</i> Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam and Comparator Agents Against Enterobacterales from Patients with Urinary Tract Infections Collected During the ATLAS Global Surveillance Program, 2017-2020

2022· article· en· W4311755506 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Estabrook, Francis F. Arhin, Daniel F. Sahm

Bibliographic record

VenueOpen Forum Infectious Diseases · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAntibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
Canadian institutionsPfizer (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTigecyclineAztreonamBroth microdilutionMicrobiologyAvibactamCeftazidime/avibactamCarbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceaeEscherichia coliImipenemAntibiotic resistanceMinimum inhibitory concentrationEnterobacteriaceaeBiologyAntimicrobialAntibioticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales (Eba) frequently carry resistance mechanisms for multiple drug classes, limiting treatment options. Avibactam (AVI) inhibits class A, class C, and some class D serine β-lactamases, while aztreonam (ATM) is refractory to hydrolysis by class B metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs). ATM-AVI is being developed for use against drug-resistant isolates of Eba, especially those co-producing MBLs and serine β-lactamases. This study evaluated the in vitro activity of ATM-AVI and comparators against Eba collected in 2017-2020 from patients with urinary tract infections (UTI) as part of the ATLAS global surveillance program. Methods Non-duplicate clinical isolates were collected from 239 sites in 55 countries in Europe, Latin America, Asia/Pacific (excluding mainland China and India), and Middle East/Africa. Susceptibility testing was performed by CLSI broth microdilution and interpreted using CLSI 2022 and FDA (tigecycline) breakpoints. PCR and sequencing were used to determine the β-lactamase genes present in all isolates with meropenem MIC >1 µg/mL, and Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis with ATM or ceftazidime MIC >1 µg/mL. Results Based on MIC90 values, ATM-AVI was at least as active as every comparator agent tested against all 15085 Eba isolates collected from UTI (0.12 µg/ml; table), with only five isolates testing with MIC values >8 µg/ml (not shown). Against resistant subsets of isolates, MIC90 values for ATM-AVI were 0.25-0.5 µg/ml, 4- to 8-fold lower than any comparator tested. Against MBL-positive isolates, ATM-AVI MIC values ranged from ≤0.015-2 µg/ml with the exception of one Escherichia coli isolate testing with an MIC value of 16 µg/ml that carried NDM-5, CMY-145, CTX-M-55 and TEM (not shown). Conclusion Based on MIC90 values, ATM-AVI was the most potent agent tested against drug-resistant and MBL-positive subsets of Eba collected from UTI. Based on the potent in vitro activity of ATM-AVI, continued development of this combination for treatment of UTI caused by drug-resistant Eba is warranted. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOpen Forum Infectious DiseasesSame topicAntibiotic Resistance in BacteriaFrench-language works237,207